<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 413 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406297</link>
    <description>The article explains that movement of goods between States is treated as an inter-State sale only where the sale contract occasions that movement; where the goods are sent under a consignment or agency arrangement, Section 6-A of the Central Sales Tax Act applies instead. On the facts discussed, the first appellate authority accepted agreements, Form-F declarations, stock and dispatch records, broker correspondence, and payment patterns to find that the goods remained the dealer&#039;s property until sale and that the broker acted only as a liaison. The Tribunal could not disregard those binding factual findings and treat the turnover as an outright inter-State sale merely on inspection materials and statements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 22:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 413 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406297</link>
      <description>The article explains that movement of goods between States is treated as an inter-State sale only where the sale contract occasions that movement; where the goods are sent under a consignment or agency arrangement, Section 6-A of the Central Sales Tax Act applies instead. On the facts discussed, the first appellate authority accepted agreements, Form-F declarations, stock and dispatch records, broker correspondence, and payment patterns to find that the goods remained the dealer&#039;s property until sale and that the broker acted only as a liaison. The Tribunal could not disregard those binding factual findings and treat the turnover as an outright inter-State sale merely on inspection materials and statements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>