https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406288 Entitlement to deduction under Section 80IB(10) was treated as settled by binding precedent, so the Revenue's objections based on the completion certificate and alleged violation of Section 310 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act did not survive for separate consideration. The court applied earlier decisions that had already resolved the issue in favour of the assessee and held that the repeated challenge could not succeed on the same legal point. The appeal was dismissed on the merits of the questions raised. en-us Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Apr 2021 09:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406288 Entitlement to deduction under Section 80IB(10) was treated as settled by binding precedent, so the Revenue's objections based on the completion certificate and alleged violation of Section 310 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act did not survive for separate consideration. The court applied earlier decisions that had already resolved the issue in favour of the assessee and held that the repeated challenge could not succeed on the same legal point. The appeal was dismissed on the merits of the questions raised. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406288