<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 402 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406286</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to restore and revive the insolvency application. It found the application maintainable, the directors competent to file it, and the Authority had the power to review its orders under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s non-compliance with the settlement agreement justified the revival of the original application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 402 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406286</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to restore and revive the insolvency application. It found the application maintainable, the directors competent to file it, and the Authority had the power to review its orders under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s non-compliance with the settlement agreement justified the revival of the original application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>