<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 386 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that interest on the refund amount is applicable after 3 months from the date of filing the claim. The delay in sanctioning the refund and the denial of interest were found to be unjust, leading to the allowance of the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 386 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that interest on the refund amount is applicable after 3 months from the date of filing the claim. The delay in sanctioning the refund and the denial of interest were found to be unjust, leading to the allowance of the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>