<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 378 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406262</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271D of the Income Tax Act for receiving a cash loan from the mother in violation of Section 269SS. The Tribunal considered the transaction genuine based on the relationship between the parties, following the principles established in a previous Madras High Court case. The penalty was overturned, emphasizing that penalties should not apply to bona fide transactions, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 23:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 378 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406262</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271D of the Income Tax Act for receiving a cash loan from the mother in violation of Section 269SS. The Tribunal considered the transaction genuine based on the relationship between the parties, following the principles established in a previous Madras High Court case. The penalty was overturned, emphasizing that penalties should not apply to bona fide transactions, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>