<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Invalid Due to Lack of Evidence on Alleged Bogus Purchases by Revenue Authority.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57554</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Bogus purchases - no clinching material had been brought on record by the revenue which could disprove the authenticity of the purchases claimed by the assessee to have been made from the aforementioned parties thus, no penalty under Sec.271(1)(c) could have validly been imposed upon him. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:02:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:02:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Invalid Due to Lack of Evidence on Alleged Bogus Purchases by Revenue Authority.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57554</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Bogus purchases - no clinching material had been brought on record by the revenue which could disprove the authenticity of the purchases claimed by the assessee to have been made from the aforementioned parties thus, no penalty under Sec.271(1)(c) could have validly been imposed upon him. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:02:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>