<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1925 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294383</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the Revenue&#039;s appeal, admitted it, and upheld the CIT(Appeals)&#039;s deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer due to lack of evidence of asset acquisition by the assessee. The Tribunal affirmed the lower authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and emphasizing the finality of its order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 21:11:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1925 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294383</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the Revenue&#039;s appeal, admitted it, and upheld the CIT(Appeals)&#039;s deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer due to lack of evidence of asset acquisition by the assessee. The Tribunal affirmed the lower authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and emphasizing the finality of its order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>