https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294386 The Tribunal upheld the invocation of the extended period of limitation, interest, and penalties against the appellant for failure to pay service tax from April 2006 to March 2011. The appellant's argument of informing the department about services before inquiry was deemed insufficient to prevent wilful suppression. The Tribunal agreed with the department that the appellant's belated realization of tax liability and failure to inform constituted suppression of facts, justifying the extended period and penalties. The appellant's lack of demonstrating a bona fide belief in non-taxability led to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Thu, 25 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Apr 2021 21:11:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294386 The Tribunal upheld the invocation of the extended period of limitation, interest, and penalties against the appellant for failure to pay service tax from April 2006 to March 2011. The appellant's argument of informing the department about services before inquiry was deemed insufficient to prevent wilful suppression. The Tribunal agreed with the department that the appellant's belated realization of tax liability and failure to inform constituted suppression of facts, justifying the extended period and penalties. The appellant's lack of demonstrating a bona fide belief in non-taxability led to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 25 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294386