<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 362 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406246</link>
    <description>Successive bail under Section 439 CrPC was declined where no fresh ground was shown after an earlier rejection. The Court noted the seizure of 150 grams of MDMA, the alleged online procurement and payment, and the investigation statement, and treated the case as involving serious NDPS allegations. The only additional circumstance cited was the petitioner&#039;s father&#039;s illness, which was not enough to justify reconsideration. In view of the alleged commercial quantity, together with the risk of tampering with witnesses and absconding, the request for bail was refused and continued custody was not disturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 07:59:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 362 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406246</link>
      <description>Successive bail under Section 439 CrPC was declined where no fresh ground was shown after an earlier rejection. The Court noted the seizure of 150 grams of MDMA, the alleged online procurement and payment, and the investigation statement, and treated the case as involving serious NDPS allegations. The only additional circumstance cited was the petitioner&#039;s father&#039;s illness, which was not enough to justify reconsideration. In view of the alleged commercial quantity, together with the risk of tampering with witnesses and absconding, the request for bail was refused and continued custody was not disturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>