<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 354 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406238</link>
    <description>The HC disposed of the Writ Petition, directing respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation for the return of seized cash, taking into account the Election Commission of India&#039;s SOP and relevant legal precedents. The respondents must provide a personal hearing and issue a decision within four weeks. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 354 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406238</link>
      <description>The HC disposed of the Writ Petition, directing respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation for the return of seized cash, taking into account the Election Commission of India&#039;s SOP and relevant legal precedents. The respondents must provide a personal hearing and issue a decision within four weeks. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>