<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 350 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406234</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the show cause notice was not validly served on the appellant, leading to the ex-parte order-in-original being deemed a legal nullity due to lack of jurisdiction. As a result, the order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of proper notice service for a legally sound adjudication order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 07:58:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 350 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406234</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the show cause notice was not validly served on the appellant, leading to the ex-parte order-in-original being deemed a legal nullity due to lack of jurisdiction. As a result, the order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of proper notice service for a legally sound adjudication order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>