<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Overturns Demand Due to Lack of Direct Evidence in Case of Alleged Clandestine Removal of Metal Goods.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57531</link>
    <description>Suppression of production and clandestine removal - bars/ rods - MS Ingots - The order is not discussing any documents of the appellant proving the alleged clandestine removal on part of the appellant. The Adjudicating Authority has merely relied upon the statement of the Director. Resultantly the confirmation of demand is merely based on third party evidence. - Demand set aside - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 07:58:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 07:58:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Overturns Demand Due to Lack of Direct Evidence in Case of Alleged Clandestine Removal of Metal Goods.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57531</link>
      <description>Suppression of production and clandestine removal - bars/ rods - MS Ingots - The order is not discussing any documents of the appellant proving the alleged clandestine removal on part of the appellant. The Adjudicating Authority has merely relied upon the statement of the Director. Resultantly the confirmation of demand is merely based on third party evidence. - Demand set aside - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 07:58:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>