<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 338 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision that section 14A and Rule 8D were not applicable due to the absence of actual exempt income during the assessment years. The judgment emphasized the importance of factual evidence and legal interpretations in determining the validity of expense disallowances under tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 07:57:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 338 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision that section 14A and Rule 8D were not applicable due to the absence of actual exempt income during the assessment years. The judgment emphasized the importance of factual evidence and legal interpretations in determining the validity of expense disallowances under tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>