<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 328 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to restrict the disallowance on account of bogus purchases to 12.5% of the value, citing the absence of appeal from the assessee and the insignificant amount involved. The Tribunal considered only the profit element taxable, as the sales were not disputed by the Revenue, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 07:57:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 328 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to restrict the disallowance on account of bogus purchases to 12.5% of the value, citing the absence of appeal from the assessee and the insignificant amount involved. The Tribunal considered only the profit element taxable, as the sales were not disputed by the Revenue, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>