<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1298 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294370</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the submission of a completion certificate is not mandatory for claiming a deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Act if construction is completed within the specified period. The Court relied on previous case law and directed the assessing officer to verify the construction completion independently of the certificate. The appellant&#039;s argument that the absence of a completion certificate distinguished this case from precedent was dismissed, with the Court reiterating that the legal requirement for the certificate was not a prerequisite for the deduction. The appeal was ultimately dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 21:01:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1298 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294370</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the submission of a completion certificate is not mandatory for claiming a deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Act if construction is completed within the specified period. The Court relied on previous case law and directed the assessing officer to verify the construction completion independently of the certificate. The appellant&#039;s argument that the absence of a completion certificate distinguished this case from precedent was dismissed, with the Court reiterating that the legal requirement for the certificate was not a prerequisite for the deduction. The appeal was ultimately dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>