<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2030 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294369</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Dispute Resolution Panel-III, New Delhi for the assessment year 2010-11 due to non-prosecution. Despite the scheduled hearing date, the assessee did not appear, and no adjournment application was submitted. The Tribunal emphasized the principle that the law supports those who are vigilant and dismissed the appeal, citing precedents like CIT vs. Multiplan India Ltd. and CIT vs. B. N. Bhattachargee, on 8th February 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 21:01:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2030 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294369</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Dispute Resolution Panel-III, New Delhi for the assessment year 2010-11 due to non-prosecution. Despite the scheduled hearing date, the assessee did not appear, and no adjournment application was submitted. The Tribunal emphasized the principle that the law supports those who are vigilant and dismissed the appeal, citing precedents like CIT vs. Multiplan India Ltd. and CIT vs. B. N. Bhattachargee, on 8th February 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>