https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294372 Section 17-A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was treated as a protection linked to public servants and was not found applicable, on a prima facie basis, to private individuals who were not shown to be public servants. On the admitted facts that the petitioners were private persons, the court directed that the impugned order not be given effect to against them and granted interim protection. The relief was expressly confined to the petitioners, while the investigation against government officers or police officials was left unaffected. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Apr 2021 21:01:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294372 Section 17-A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was treated as a protection linked to public servants and was not found applicable, on a prima facie basis, to private individuals who were not shown to be public servants. On the admitted facts that the petitioners were private persons, the court directed that the impugned order not be given effect to against them and granted interim protection. The relief was expressly confined to the petitioners, while the investigation against government officers or police officials was left unaffected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294372