https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294371 An FIR alleging offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Companies Act was not quashed in writ jurisdiction because the allegations were found sufficient to disclose cognizable offences, and delay or asserted falsity did not justify interference at the threshold. The Court directed that investigation should continue, but protected the petitioners from arrest until submission of the police report under Section 173(2) CrPC, subject to cooperation in the investigation. The writ petition therefore failed, while limited interim relief was granted during the pendency of investigation. en-us Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Apr 2021 21:01:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294371 An FIR alleging offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Companies Act was not quashed in writ jurisdiction because the allegations were found sufficient to disclose cognizable offences, and delay or asserted falsity did not justify interference at the threshold. The Court directed that investigation should continue, but protected the petitioners from arrest until submission of the police report under Section 173(2) CrPC, subject to cooperation in the investigation. The writ petition therefore failed, while limited interim relief was granted during the pendency of investigation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294371