<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 306 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406190</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Department&#039;s position, denying CENVAT credit for towers, tower materials, and pre-fabricated shelters as capital goods or inputs, classifying them as immovable property. However, it ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the applicability of the extended period of limitation, finding the demands time-barred due to the interpretational nature of the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 306 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406190</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Department&#039;s position, denying CENVAT credit for towers, tower materials, and pre-fabricated shelters as capital goods or inputs, classifying them as immovable property. However, it ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the applicability of the extended period of limitation, finding the demands time-barred due to the interpretational nature of the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>