<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Estimated Disallowance of 50% on Commission and Improvement Costs.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57528</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - estimation of disallowance at 50% of commission and improvement expenditure - in this case, the additions were made on the basis of estimation and as discussed in the cases referred above, the penalty cannot be levied on the basis of estimated additions and thus, it is not a fit case for levying penalty. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 09:42:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 09:42:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Estimated Disallowance of 50% on Commission and Improvement Costs.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57528</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - estimation of disallowance at 50% of commission and improvement expenditure - in this case, the additions were made on the basis of estimation and as discussed in the cases referred above, the penalty cannot be levied on the basis of estimated additions and thus, it is not a fit case for levying penalty. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 09:42:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>