<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 299 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406183</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act on the entire Long Term Capital Gains invested in a new property, despite joint ownership with family members. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the exemption was dismissed as the Tribunal found no merit in their arguments and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision based on legal principles and factual findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 299 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406183</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to grant exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act on the entire Long Term Capital Gains invested in a new property, despite joint ownership with family members. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the exemption was dismissed as the Tribunal found no merit in their arguments and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision based on legal principles and factual findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>