<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1324 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294355</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court rejected the plea to refer the matter to a larger Bench, finding no conflict between the judgments in Prem Nath Kaul and Sampat Prakash. It also held that Sampat Prakash was not per incuriam. The petitions challenging the constitutionality of the Constitution Orders issued under Article 370 were not referred to a larger Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1324 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294355</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court rejected the plea to refer the matter to a larger Bench, finding no conflict between the judgments in Prem Nath Kaul and Sampat Prakash. It also held that Sampat Prakash was not per incuriam. The petitions challenging the constitutionality of the Constitution Orders issued under Article 370 were not referred to a larger Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>