https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294361 The court mandated physical presence of the petitioner for interrogation in various jurisdictions, emphasizing the importance of in-person questioning for effective investigation. Video conferencing for interrogation was denied due to limitations in assessing demeanor and responses. Detailed security measures during transit were outlined, including supervision by senior police officials, armed commandos, and armored vehicles. The petitioner was directed to be handcuffed for safety during transit, balancing concerns of escape and safety. The court aimed to safeguard the petitioner's rights while facilitating thorough investigation, with specific instructions for police compliance and accountability. en-us Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Apr 2021 12:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294361 The court mandated physical presence of the petitioner for interrogation in various jurisdictions, emphasizing the importance of in-person questioning for effective investigation. Video conferencing for interrogation was denied due to limitations in assessing demeanor and responses. Detailed security measures during transit were outlined, including supervision by senior police officials, armed commandos, and armored vehicles. The petitioner was directed to be handcuffed for safety during transit, balancing concerns of escape and safety. The court aimed to safeguard the petitioner's rights while facilitating thorough investigation, with specific instructions for police compliance and accountability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294361