https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406172 Further custodial interrogation was found unnecessary where the accused had already undergone five days of custody and the seized electronic devices and data were already with the investigating agency. The Court noted that the agency could confront the accused with that material even in judicial custody, subject to permission from the trial court, so additional police custody was not justified. The refusal to grant further custody was therefore sustained, and the revision failed on merits. en-us Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Apr 2021 21:50:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406172 Further custodial interrogation was found unnecessary where the accused had already undergone five days of custody and the seized electronic devices and data were already with the investigating agency. The Court noted that the agency could confront the accused with that material even in judicial custody, subject to permission from the trial court, so additional police custody was not justified. The refusal to grant further custody was therefore sustained, and the revision failed on merits. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406172