<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 31 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25121</link>
    <description>For section 80-0 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a &quot;foreign enterprise&quot; is construed as an enterprise of foreign nationality or foreign ownership, so an Indian company&#039;s branch or unit situated abroad does not qualify on that basis. The note also states that approval under section 80-0 does not depend on the agreement itself being entered into with a foreign State or a foreign enterprise; the statute requires the income to arise from the specified use of rights or technical services, but does not add a separate counterparty . On that construction, the objection to approval based on the contracting party was rejected, while the objection based on the Indian branch being a foreign enterprise failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:26:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 31 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25121</link>
      <description>For section 80-0 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a &quot;foreign enterprise&quot; is construed as an enterprise of foreign nationality or foreign ownership, so an Indian company&#039;s branch or unit situated abroad does not qualify on that basis. The note also states that approval under section 80-0 does not depend on the agreement itself being entered into with a foreign State or a foreign enterprise; the statute requires the income to arise from the specified use of rights or technical services, but does not add a separate counterparty . On that construction, the objection to approval based on the contracting party was rejected, while the objection based on the Indian branch being a foreign enterprise failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>