<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Affirms Advertising Expenditure Ruling: Size Doesn&#039;t Dictate Revenue or Capital Nature, Supports Lower Tax Authorities.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57512</link>
    <description>Disallowance of advertising expenditure - the deletion of the addition made by the A.O. qua expenditure incurred on advertising both by the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, to our minds, was in order. The extent of expenditure on advertising does not, in our view, decide as to whether the expenditure incurred is of a revenue nature or of a capital nature. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 13:51:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 13:51:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Affirms Advertising Expenditure Ruling: Size Doesn&#039;t Dictate Revenue or Capital Nature, Supports Lower Tax Authorities.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57512</link>
      <description>Disallowance of advertising expenditure - the deletion of the addition made by the A.O. qua expenditure incurred on advertising both by the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, to our minds, was in order. The extent of expenditure on advertising does not, in our view, decide as to whether the expenditure incurred is of a revenue nature or of a capital nature. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 13:51:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>