https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406169 Where a complaint under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act discloses a prima facie case, disputed pleas about the accused's role in the company, authority to sign the cheque, and the genuineness or execution of the cheque cannot be conclusively decided in quashing proceedings. The court noted contested factual questions on when the petitioner associated with the company, whether he was in charge of its affairs, and whether the cheque was issued in discharge of liability. Those issues had to be examined at trial, so the challenge to the complaint and summoning orders was not accepted and the proceedings were permitted to continue. en-us Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Apr 2021 09:21:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406169 Where a complaint under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act discloses a prima facie case, disputed pleas about the accused's role in the company, authority to sign the cheque, and the genuineness or execution of the cheque cannot be conclusively decided in quashing proceedings. The court noted contested factual questions on when the petitioner associated with the company, whether he was in charge of its affairs, and whether the cheque was issued in discharge of liability. Those issues had to be examined at trial, so the challenge to the complaint and summoning orders was not accepted and the proceedings were permitted to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406169