https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406168 Limited permission for an accused to retain a passport and travel abroad for business was sustained where earlier travel permissions had been complied with and no breach of conditions was shown. The High Court found that the Designated Court had imposed adequate safeguards, including advance disclosure of itinerary and contact details, an undertaking to remain available for trial, restrictions on travel during examination of crucial witnesses, and a cap on continuous stay abroad. In those circumstances, the order was held to strike a proper balance between the seriousness of the allegations, the accused's business needs, and the requirements of investigation and trial, so no revisionary interference was warranted. en-us Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Apr 2021 09:21:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406168 Limited permission for an accused to retain a passport and travel abroad for business was sustained where earlier travel permissions had been complied with and no breach of conditions was shown. The High Court found that the Designated Court had imposed adequate safeguards, including advance disclosure of itinerary and contact details, an undertaking to remain available for trial, restrictions on travel during examination of crucial witnesses, and a cap on continuous stay abroad. In those circumstances, the order was held to strike a proper balance between the seriousness of the allegations, the accused's business needs, and the requirements of investigation and trial, so no revisionary interference was warranted. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406168