https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406167 Interim protection in a writ petition challenging provisional attachment proceedings and a show cause notice under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was declined because the attachment was only provisional, the notice had already been issued, and no interim relief had been granted in the connected matter arising from the same facts. The petitioner's objections based on the alleged absence of scheduled predicate offences and alleged inadequacy of reasons in the attachment order were noted, but the court directed the respondents to file a counter affidavit, permitted a rejoinder, and listed the matter for admission and final disposal with the connected appeal. en-us Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Apr 2021 09:21:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406167 Interim protection in a writ petition challenging provisional attachment proceedings and a show cause notice under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was declined because the attachment was only provisional, the notice had already been issued, and no interim relief had been granted in the connected matter arising from the same facts. The petitioner's objections based on the alleged absence of scheduled predicate offences and alleged inadequacy of reasons in the attachment order were noted, but the court directed the respondents to file a counter affidavit, permitted a rejoinder, and listed the matter for admission and final disposal with the connected appeal. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406167