https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406166 The Court declined the petitioners' request to withdraw the writ petition challenging the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. It held that the order was still valid despite the expiration of 180 days, citing pandemic-related court orders. The Court allowed the respondents to proceed with a complaint under the Act while maintaining the interim order. The parties were directed to file affidavits promptly, and further proceedings were deferred pending affidavit submission. en-us Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Apr 2021 09:21:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406166 The Court declined the petitioners' request to withdraw the writ petition challenging the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. It held that the order was still valid despite the expiration of 180 days, citing pandemic-related court orders. The Court allowed the respondents to proceed with a complaint under the Act while maintaining the interim order. The parties were directed to file affidavits promptly, and further proceedings were deferred pending affidavit submission. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406166