<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 280 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406164</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta addressed challenges to the vires of section 16(2)(c) of the C.G.S.T. Act, 2017 in several writ petitions. The Court directed the filing of affidavits-in-opposition and replies, transferring the cases to a regular Bench due to time constraints.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 280 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406164</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta addressed challenges to the vires of section 16(2)(c) of the C.G.S.T. Act, 2017 in several writ petitions. The Court directed the filing of affidavits-in-opposition and replies, transferring the cases to a regular Bench due to time constraints.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>