<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 278 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406162</link>
    <description>The writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable. The petitioner lacked locus standi to challenge the decision allowing the conversion of online lottery distributorship to paper lottery. The court found no violation of Article 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and rejected the petitioner&#039;s request for specific performance of the contract. The interim order was vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 09:21:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 278 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406162</link>
      <description>The writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable. The petitioner lacked locus standi to challenge the decision allowing the conversion of online lottery distributorship to paper lottery. The court found no violation of Article 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and rejected the petitioner&#039;s request for specific performance of the contract. The interim order was vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>