<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 276 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406160</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that no tax liability could be imposed as the unutilized provision amount was not payable to anyone and did not accrue as income. Emphasizing that tax deductions are required when income accrues, the Court concluded that in the absence of income accrual, there is no obligation to deduct tax at source. Therefore, the Court allowed the appeal, quashing the orders of the lower authorities and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 276 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406160</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that no tax liability could be imposed as the unutilized provision amount was not payable to anyone and did not accrue as income. Emphasizing that tax deductions are required when income accrues, the Court concluded that in the absence of income accrual, there is no obligation to deduct tax at source. Therefore, the Court allowed the appeal, quashing the orders of the lower authorities and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>