<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 270 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406154</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restoring the order passed by the CIT(A). The Court held in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing that the Tribunal erred in remanding the matter back to the Assessing Officer when a detailed enquiry had already been conducted. The Court stressed that the Tribunal, as the final fact-finding authority, should record correct findings of fact based on the evidence presented and not remand cases unnecessarily.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 09:20:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 270 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406154</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restoring the order passed by the CIT(A). The Court held in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing that the Tribunal erred in remanding the matter back to the Assessing Officer when a detailed enquiry had already been conducted. The Court stressed that the Tribunal, as the final fact-finding authority, should record correct findings of fact based on the evidence presented and not remand cases unnecessarily.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>