<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 266 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406150</link>
    <description>The court allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal and upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to claim brought forward and carry forward of excess application of income. It determined that such claims did not amount to double deduction as the income was already exempt. Relying on previous decisions and commercial principles, the court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 09:19:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 266 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406150</link>
      <description>The court allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal and upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to claim brought forward and carry forward of excess application of income. It determined that such claims did not amount to double deduction as the income was already exempt. Relying on previous decisions and commercial principles, the court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>