<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 263 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406147</link>
    <description>The court quashed the proceedings in C.C.No.60 of 2018 against Padmanabhan Kishore (A2) after finding that the prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was misconceived. The court held that since the money seized by the CBI did not become proceeds of a crime as it was seized before being projected as untainted, the application of the PML Act was not justified. As a result, the writ petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 09:19:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 263 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406147</link>
      <description>The court quashed the proceedings in C.C.No.60 of 2018 against Padmanabhan Kishore (A2) after finding that the prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was misconceived. The court held that since the money seized by the CBI did not become proceeds of a crime as it was seized before being projected as untainted, the application of the PML Act was not justified. As a result, the writ petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>