https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294337 Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC were held not to justify quashing where the accused had persistently evaded process, warrants had been issued, and proclamation steps had been taken. The acquittal of the co-accused was not treated as a sufficient basis to terminate the proceedings in favour of an absconding accused. The proceedings were allowed to continue, with liberty to the accused to surrender before the Magistrate and, if so advised, seek discharge on available grounds. en-us Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Apr 2021 09:14:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294337 Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC were held not to justify quashing where the accused had persistently evaded process, warrants had been issued, and proclamation steps had been taken. The acquittal of the co-accused was not treated as a sufficient basis to terminate the proceedings in favour of an absconding accused. The proceedings were allowed to continue, with liberty to the accused to surrender before the Magistrate and, if so advised, seek discharge on available grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294337