<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 25 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25109</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh held that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by entertaining an appeal that had already been allowed in full by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Court also found the Tribunal&#039;s fresh inquiry into assessment without proper notices and direction for tax refund without any claim or order to be legally incorrect. The Court answered all questions posed by the Tribunal, emphasizing these errors and did not award costs in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:42:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 25 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25109</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh held that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by entertaining an appeal that had already been allowed in full by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Court also found the Tribunal&#039;s fresh inquiry into assessment without proper notices and direction for tax refund without any claim or order to be legally incorrect. The Court answered all questions posed by the Tribunal, emphasizing these errors and did not award costs in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>