<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 696 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294326</link>
    <description>The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision that a writ was not the appropriate remedy for the dispute over property title. However, the court modified the order to allow the petitioner to establish his rights in an appropriate forum through proper proceedings, aiming to protect the petitioner&#039;s interests without unfairly prejudicing the other party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 17:52:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 696 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294326</link>
      <description>The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision that a writ was not the appropriate remedy for the dispute over property title. However, the court modified the order to allow the petitioner to establish his rights in an appropriate forum through proper proceedings, aiming to protect the petitioner&#039;s interests without unfairly prejudicing the other party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>