https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294324 Failure to obtain previous sanction under Section 196-A CrPC did not, by itself, require quashing once proceedings had advanced to a valid committal or conviction context, because the provision operated as a safeguard against frivolous conspiracy allegations. Where the prosecution case alleged commission of substantive offences in pursuance of the alleged agreement, the proper course was to charge the actual offence and abetment by conspiracy under Section 109, rather than criminal conspiracy under Section 120-B. The court held that the conspiracy provisions had been wrongly applied, but that defect justified amendment of the charge, not quashing of the petition. en-us Fri, 17 Sep 1937 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Apr 2021 16:52:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294324 Failure to obtain previous sanction under Section 196-A CrPC did not, by itself, require quashing once proceedings had advanced to a valid committal or conviction context, because the provision operated as a safeguard against frivolous conspiracy allegations. Where the prosecution case alleged commission of substantive offences in pursuance of the alleged agreement, the proper course was to charge the actual offence and abetment by conspiracy under Section 109, rather than criminal conspiracy under Section 120-B. The court held that the conspiracy provisions had been wrongly applied, but that defect justified amendment of the charge, not quashing of the petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Sep 1937 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294324