<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 47 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25106</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessee, a public company, is entitled to claim the entire sum of Rs. 2,59,451 as a deduction for the initial contribution to an approved superannuation fund for the assessment year 1976-77. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, disregarding the conflicting conditions in Notification No. SO 3433 dated October 21, 1965, which limited the deductible amount and spread it over five years, as these conditions exceeded the Board&#039;s power and conflicted with the Income-tax Act provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:34:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 47 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25106</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessee, a public company, is entitled to claim the entire sum of Rs. 2,59,451 as a deduction for the initial contribution to an approved superannuation fund for the assessment year 1976-77. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, disregarding the conflicting conditions in Notification No. SO 3433 dated October 21, 1965, which limited the deductible amount and spread it over five years, as these conditions exceeded the Board&#039;s power and conflicted with the Income-tax Act provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>