<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 220 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406104</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee had adequately proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions involving OFCDs. The reliance on outdated statements and reports by the AO was deemed insufficient, leading to the dismissal of Revenue&#039;s appeals and confirming the deletion of the additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 08:52:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 220 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406104</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee had adequately proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions involving OFCDs. The reliance on outdated statements and reports by the AO was deemed insufficient, leading to the dismissal of Revenue&#039;s appeals and confirming the deletion of the additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>