https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25100 No referable question of law arose where tax liability of a partitioned Hindu undivided family was apportioned on the basis of a recognised partition and no legal infirmity was shown in that method. The challenge to the apportionment failed because the assessment proceeded on the assets allotted under the partition. The alleged validity of two gift deeds executed by the karta was also not a live issue, as those deeds had already been treated as invalid and the liability was not worked out on their basis. The application was therefore rejected, with the controversy confined to an academic issue unsupported by any substantive legal question. en-us Fri, 27 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:18:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25100 No referable question of law arose where tax liability of a partitioned Hindu undivided family was apportioned on the basis of a recognised partition and no legal infirmity was shown in that method. The challenge to the apportionment failed because the assessment proceeded on the assets allotted under the partition. The alleged validity of two gift deeds executed by the karta was also not a live issue, as those deeds had already been treated as invalid and the liability was not worked out on their basis. The application was therefore rejected, with the controversy confined to an academic issue unsupported by any substantive legal question. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 27 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25100