<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1872 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294315</link>
    <description>The court directed respondent No.2 to release the goods and vehicle within seven days upon the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee of Rs. 20,51,833 and an additional bank guarantee for Rs. 1,02,591 as penalty and tax amount. The court clarified that the order did not prejudice the respondent&#039;s claim regarding the ownership of the goods and vehicle, leaving the issue of ownership to be determined in a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 19:50:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1872 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294315</link>
      <description>The court directed respondent No.2 to release the goods and vehicle within seven days upon the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee of Rs. 20,51,833 and an additional bank guarantee for Rs. 1,02,591 as penalty and tax amount. The court clarified that the order did not prejudice the respondent&#039;s claim regarding the ownership of the goods and vehicle, leaving the issue of ownership to be determined in a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>