<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 704 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294305</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Assessee had not commenced business activity during the relevant previous year for the assessment year 1998-99. Despite arguments by the Assessee citing various indicators, the Court found that the only activity undertaken was a single transaction for registration purposes, with no substantial steps towards actual business operations. Emphasizing the requirement for being &quot;set up&quot; before commencement, the Court concluded that the Assessee was not prepared to start business activities. The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal&#039;s decision, although debatable, did not warrant interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 15:19:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 704 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294305</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Assessee had not commenced business activity during the relevant previous year for the assessment year 1998-99. Despite arguments by the Assessee citing various indicators, the Court found that the only activity undertaken was a single transaction for registration purposes, with no substantial steps towards actual business operations. Emphasizing the requirement for being &quot;set up&quot; before commencement, the Court concluded that the Assessee was not prepared to start business activities. The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal&#039;s decision, although debatable, did not warrant interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>