<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (6) TMI 46 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25092</link>
    <description>Subsidy granted for setting up industries in backward areas is a percentage measure of fixed capital investment and, absent a direct or indirect nexus to a specific capital asset, cannot be allocated against that asset to reduce its actual cost for depreciation. The court reasoned the scheme neither prescribes utilisation of the grant nor ties it to particular assets, and the subsidy may legitimately fund nondepreciable items, working capital, or loan repayment. Consequently the subsidy need not be deducted from asset cost and depreciation is allowable on the assessee&#039;s claimed asset cost; view affirmed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 23:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (6) TMI 46 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25092</link>
      <description>Subsidy granted for setting up industries in backward areas is a percentage measure of fixed capital investment and, absent a direct or indirect nexus to a specific capital asset, cannot be allocated against that asset to reduce its actual cost for depreciation. The court reasoned the scheme neither prescribes utilisation of the grant nor ties it to particular assets, and the subsidy may legitimately fund nondepreciable items, working capital, or loan repayment. Consequently the subsidy need not be deducted from asset cost and depreciation is allowable on the assessee&#039;s claimed asset cost; view affirmed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>