<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 164 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406048</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upholding the decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2011-12. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be imposed on estimated additions and highlighted the importance of precise calculations in tax assessments. The decision underscored established legal principles and precedents, affirming that penalties should not be based on speculative or estimated amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 09:20:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 164 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406048</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upholding the decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2011-12. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties should not be imposed on estimated additions and highlighted the importance of precise calculations in tax assessments. The decision underscored established legal principles and precedents, affirming that penalties should not be based on speculative or estimated amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>