<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 162 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406046</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the assessees&#039; appeals. The additions under Section 68 were deemed unjustified as the assessees proved the identity and creditworthiness of investors/lenders. The CIT(A)&#039;s enhancement on alleged commission income was beyond jurisdiction. The restriction of disallowance under Section 14A by the CIT(A) was upheld, and the admission of additional evidence was considered part of departmental records, not new evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2021 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 162 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406046</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowed the assessees&#039; appeals. The additions under Section 68 were deemed unjustified as the assessees proved the identity and creditworthiness of investors/lenders. The CIT(A)&#039;s enhancement on alleged commission income was beyond jurisdiction. The restriction of disallowance under Section 14A by the CIT(A) was upheld, and the admission of additional evidence was considered part of departmental records, not new evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>