<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1547 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294291</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271AAA of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had disclosed the income, specified its derivation, and substantiated it with evidence, meeting the conditions of the Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that the Commissioner&#039;s order was well-reasoned and did not warrant interference. The order was pronounced on May 4, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2021 14:53:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1547 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294291</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271AAA of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had disclosed the income, specified its derivation, and substantiated it with evidence, meeting the conditions of the Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that the Commissioner&#039;s order was well-reasoned and did not warrant interference. The order was pronounced on May 4, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>