<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 141 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406025</link>
    <description>The court ruled that if the petitioner files a statutory appeal challenging the order within the prescribed time limit, the respondents are prohibited from invoking the bank guarantee for one week after the appeal is filed. The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for filing appeals and provides specific instructions to safeguard the petitioner&#039;s interests regarding the bank guarantee until the appeal process is initiated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 141 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406025</link>
      <description>The court ruled that if the petitioner files a statutory appeal challenging the order within the prescribed time limit, the respondents are prohibited from invoking the bank guarantee for one week after the appeal is filed. The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for filing appeals and provides specific instructions to safeguard the petitioner&#039;s interests regarding the bank guarantee until the appeal process is initiated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>